PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.20%
Revenue growth under 50% of AEM's 25.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-7.24%
Negative gross profit growth while AEM is at 27.48%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
46.83%
EBIT growth 50-75% of AEM's 66.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
46.83%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of AEM's 66.91%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
22.02%
Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.67%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.24%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 0.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
10.44%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 0.36%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.42%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
27.48%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
75.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 638.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.46%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
936.18%
Positive OCF/share growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-41.26%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
657.46%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-46.67%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2332.51%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 167.07%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
60.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 68.13%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
220.52%
AR growth well above AEM's 28.46%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.22%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 5.03%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.70%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 1.44%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-4.54%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 16.87%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.31%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.