PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.79%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AEM's 57.95%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
45.14%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AEM's 112.55%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
50.25%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 544.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
50.25%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 544.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
51.37%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 382.54%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
36.36%
EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 381.82%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 372.73%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
9.22%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 0.34%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.14%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.41%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 489.50%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
140.85%
FCF growth above 1.5x AEM's 35.54%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
235.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 1175.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
179.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AEM's 181.53%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
33.83%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
399.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 151.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
53.51%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 68.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
37.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 221.67%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
73.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to AEM's 69.89%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 30.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Negative asset growth while AEM invests at 3.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.17%
We have a declining book value while AEM shows 2.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-52.05%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 4.38%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 21.87%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.