PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.09%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 1.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.91%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.34%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.34%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-12.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.85%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 38.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-17.03%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 68.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
213.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 651.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
160.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 110.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
25.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 83.70%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
445.64%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 45.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
24.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 2.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 17.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
15.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
443.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 219.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
64.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to AEM's 68.46%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.90%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 1.47%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
3.12%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 1.94%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
270.10%
Debt growth far above AEM's 4.57%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.61%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 59.15%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.