Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.94%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.

Reduced diluted shares while AEM is at 1.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth above 1.5x AEM's 7.80%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 75.29%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 10.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 358.23%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.

Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 503.38%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 81.38%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 15.56%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive asset growth while AEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 40.94%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We cut SG&A while AEM invests at 38.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.