PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.93%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 16.60%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.34%
Negative gross profit growth while AEM is at 31.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-16.55%
Negative EBIT growth while AEM is at 77.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-16.55%
Negative operating income growth while AEM is at 77.08%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-15.36%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 145.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.00%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 148.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 148.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.21%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.12%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 0.19%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-44.44%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-25.60%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 2.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-394.81%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
474.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 871.68%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
155.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 274.54%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
104.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 227.22%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
318.78%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 875.36%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
198.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to AEM's 215.84%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
151.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 1418.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
2734.24%
Below 50% of AEM's 6950.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
292.06%
Below 50% of AEM's 634.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
215.81%
Below 50% of AEM's 671.19%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
3071.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 529.77%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
146.06%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 41.56%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
59.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 15.00%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.09%
AR growth well above AEM's 1.52%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.34%
Negative asset growth while AEM invests at 2.98%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
4.54%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 3.34%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-11.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.