PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.22%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 12.47%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AEM's 61.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 77.11%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.53%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 77.11%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-15.01%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 121.43%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 121.46%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 121.46%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-7.83%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 82.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-109.37%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 5127.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
436.30%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AEM's 397.61%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
232.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 296.89%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
3.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 15.83%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
5716.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 1213.18%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
275.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 352.61%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
-10.86%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM stands at 40.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
355.00%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 272.26%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
299.42%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 59.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-35.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM is 108.30%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
4976.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 176.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 5.78%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
41.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-13.59%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 10.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.72%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.93%
Under 50% of AEM's 4.10%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 5.21%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.