PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.63%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AEM's 5.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
9.27%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
9.27%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
9.27%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-92.92%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-94.44%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-94.44%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.20%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 12.44%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 12.56%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-60.06%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
17.39%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
8.48%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.92%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 132.19%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
-11.70%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
154.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 115.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
132.02%
Below 50% of AEM's 486.45%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-29.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
118.90%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-88.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AEM is 33.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-96.72%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM is 85.05%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-65.69%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while AEM stands at 259.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
91.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 10.50%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
40.25%
Positive short-term equity growth while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while AEM cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-64.69%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 6.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while AEM stands at 24.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.13%
Positive asset growth while AEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.66%
Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.03%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AEM's 5.35%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
We cut SG&A while AEM invests at 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.