PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.36%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 8.57%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-25.34%
Negative gross profit growth while AEM is at 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-25.34%
Negative EBIT growth while AEM is at 38.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-25.34%
Negative operating income growth while AEM is at 38.14%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1057.27%
Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1300.00%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1300.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.48%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 1.72%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.44%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 1.71%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-8.03%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-21.81%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 130.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-15.44%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 156.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
299.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 343.23%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
43.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 57.44%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
-30.25%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
511.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with AEM's 467.19%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
22.41%
Below 50% of AEM's 125.23%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-45.18%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
269.19%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-5.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-65.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM is 97.15%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
583.10%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 250.86%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
94.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 9.07%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
30.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 2.17%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.88%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
98.06%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.64%
Asset growth well under 50% of AEM's 2.48%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-2.60%
We have a declining book value while AEM shows 0.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.03%
We have some new debt while AEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AEM's 4.02%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.