PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.83%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
16.30%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.77%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 55.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.77%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 55.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-76.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-75.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-75.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.35%
Share reduction while AEM is at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.35%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
6.53%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while AEM cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
34.00%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-875.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
425.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 211.58%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
17.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-38.61%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
697.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 178.94%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-6.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is at 20.64%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-53.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM stands at 4.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1205.32%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-220.54%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-183.76%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
619.11%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 208.48%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
60.71%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.65%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-43.68%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 30.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
12.44%
Positive asset growth while AEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-4.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
126.58%
We have some new debt while AEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
We expand SG&A while AEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.