PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.84%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-5.28%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.35%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-86.91%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 26.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-86.84%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-86.84%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.19%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 0.21%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while AEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
17.11%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while AEM cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
8.12%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
127.02%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
196.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 46.00%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
7.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.99%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
192.99%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-14.53%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
13.51%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-77.12%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-93.99%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AEM is 107.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-90.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM is 110.68%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
285.20%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 93.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
49.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 6.60%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
18.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 16.55%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.97%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-42.97%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-20.14%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 3.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while AEM stands at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.73%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.66%
We have a declining book value while AEM shows 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-11.30%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.99%
We cut SG&A while AEM invests at 49.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.