PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.88%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
9.53%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
8.65%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.65%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
10.43%
Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.14%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 1.73%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 1.83%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.97%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
4.72%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
141.61%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AEM's 154.31%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
-20.62%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
8.81%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 1.07%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
124.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 33.57%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-42.27%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-1.57%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
48.42%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-61.72%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-13.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM is 17.20%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
238.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 54.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
41.60%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 9.76%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
16.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.46%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-5.82%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AEM invests at 16.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
13.77%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.47%
Negative asset growth while AEM invests at 4.03%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.03%
Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.43%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 13.93%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
We expand SG&A while AEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.