PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.46%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
15.06%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.70%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
16.70%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-306.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-306.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-306.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.14%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.16%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-9.68%
Dividend reduction while AEM stands at 15.24%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
27.85%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
27.22%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
143.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 203.66%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
-32.40%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
44.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 2.90%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
141.95%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with AEM's 138.08%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
-47.98%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is at 16.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
46.92%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-379.09%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-162.02%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-321.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM is 251.03%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
215.88%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 48.54%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
26.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 7.48%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
13.10%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 11.36%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.02%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AEM is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
62.84%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 27.19%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-45.82%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 54.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.45%
We have a declining book value while AEM shows 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-9.84%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
We cut SG&A while AEM invests at 2.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.