PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.85%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 2.33%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.34%
Negative gross profit growth while AEM is at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-14.45%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-14.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
149.47%
Net income growth above 1.5x AEM's 28.01%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
148.39%
EPS growth above 1.5x AEM's 26.67%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
148.39%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AEM's 26.67%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while AEM stands at 11.38%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-24.07%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 24.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-23.82%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 116.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
105.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 188.47%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
-22.48%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AEM stands at 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
27.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 10.39%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
91.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 137.98%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-39.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is at 5.37%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
17.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 33.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
23.01%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-59.13%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AEM is 39.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
15.47%
Below 50% of AEM's 44.26%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
205.07%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 43.32%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
22.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 5.70%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-6.81%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AEM is at 11.21%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.08%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 14.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.80%
Negative asset growth while AEM invests at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.53%
Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-13.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 17.12%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.