PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.83%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AEM's 3.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.55%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AEM's 18.53%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-10.38%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.38%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-79.93%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-81.25%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-81.25%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.17%
Slight or no buybacks while AEM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.23%
Slight or no buyback while AEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
1.54%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while AEM cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
0.04%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 1.97%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
126.84%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
222.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 372.55%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
-5.56%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-11.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM stands at 3.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
210.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 300.72%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-29.99%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-26.27%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
108.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-94.15%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AEM is 35.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
103.66%
Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
254.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 20.09%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
23.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 13.62%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
12.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 2.33%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.85%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
77.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 29.79%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
118.02%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.46%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-8.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 6.66%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.