PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.17%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 10.27%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.25%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AEM's 2.01%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.15%
EBIT growth 50-75% of AEM's 5.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
3.15%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of AEM's 5.27%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
2.06%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 332.64%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 0.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.23%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 0.35%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
3.61%
Dividend growth under 50% of AEM's 54.93%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-7.33%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-7.91%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
88.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 109.20%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
31.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AEM's 32.88%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-14.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM stands at 41.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
42.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 213.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
16.03%
Below 50% of AEM's 39.40%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-25.58%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM stands at 100.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
16.64%
Below 50% of AEM's 353.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
23.39%
Below 50% of AEM's 1483.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
603.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 397.35%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
136.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 21.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
21.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 11.53%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
6.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to AEM's 6.89%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 107.77%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
47.34%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 58.36%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
17.16%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
Asset growth well under 50% of AEM's 5.82%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.16%
Under 50% of AEM's 6.48%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-13.66%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 2.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AEM's 29.62%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.