PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.44%
Revenue growth under 50% of AEM's 39.68%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
19.36%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AEM's 37.87%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
12.09%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 25.20%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.09%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 25.20%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 15.81%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-46.15%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-46.15%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.13%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 57.30%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 57.18%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while AEM stands at 41.45%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
7.81%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 93.88%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
251.29%
FCF growth under 50% of AEM's 763.17%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
20.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 24.48%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
51.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 42.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
34.55%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 51.88%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
0.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 14.68%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
71.89%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 34.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
75.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 108.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-16.12%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
151.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
170.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 96.06%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
80.17%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 122.07%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
24.93%
Below 50% of AEM's 100.70%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
19.74%
Below 50% of AEM's 117.11%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.73%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-15.06%
Inventory is declining while AEM stands at 28.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.76%
Asset growth well under 50% of AEM's 129.03%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.46%
Under 50% of AEM's 72.85%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.09%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 0.87%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AEM's 96.17%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.