95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.82%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 2.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
26.25%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FNV's 6.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
25.56%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 19.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
25.56%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 8.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
29.72%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 20.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
33.33%
EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.43%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 17.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 0.05%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.53%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.67%
OCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 48.94%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
79.67%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
45.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 177.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-25.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FNV stands at 85.48%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
24.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 6.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
569.66%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 65.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1286.38%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.75%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
283.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 5.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.91%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.18%
Asset growth at 75-90% of FNV's 5.52%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
4.26%
75-90% of FNV's 4.86%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.59%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.