PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.10%
Revenue growth under 50% of FNV's 2.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.09%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of FNV's 6.01%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-47.73%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 19.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-47.73%
Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 8.68%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
4.94%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 20.08%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.23%
OCF growth under 50% of FNV's 48.94%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
0.23%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
159.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 177.64%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
191.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 85.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
245.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 6.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 181.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
2350.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 65.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
230.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 156.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
228.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.75%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1189.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.88%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1571.05%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 5.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.73%
Similar asset growth to FNV's 5.52%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
8.82%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 4.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
We expand SG&A while FNV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.