PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.50%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 2.23%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.30%
Negative gross profit growth while FNV is at 6.01%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-5.62%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 19.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-5.62%
Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 8.68%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-16.06%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 20.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while FNV is at 17.43%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FNV is at 17.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.34%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.70%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.65%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 48.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-2.65%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
141.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 177.64%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
124.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 85.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.43%
Below 50% of FNV's 181.36%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-7.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV stands at 65.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
622.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 156.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
229.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.75%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
874.54%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 60.76%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
1188.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 27.88%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-88.33%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FNV is at 5.06%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.81%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.34%
Asset growth above 1.5x FNV's 5.52%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.70%
Under 50% of FNV's 4.86%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.