PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
68.51%
Positive revenue growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
62.95%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
82.56%
Positive EBIT growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
82.56%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 2.92%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
82.05%
Positive net income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
57.14%
Positive EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
83.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
5.19%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 9.64%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 9.47%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.55%
OCF growth at 50-75% of FNV's 107.22%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
-769.02%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 168.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
201.56%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.40%
Positive 3Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.53%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 2.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
12.86%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 2.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
261.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 11.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
4.77%
Below 50% of FNV's 11.75%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
1398.92%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 10.11%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-82.05%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FNV is at 10.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
87.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 10.11%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.67%
AR growth well above FNV's 16.50%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.25%
Asset growth above 1.5x FNV's 3.27%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
19.91%
Positive BV/share change while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
88.69%
Debt growth of 88.69% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.