PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.28%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-17.67%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-6.08%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.08%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
30.00%
Positive net income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
75.00%
Positive EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
75.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.40%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.08%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.45%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.10%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.22%
OCF growth under 50% of FNV's 23.06%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
5.22%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
210.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 14.70%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
149.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 14.70%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
51.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 14.70%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1261.50%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
330.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
67.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
426.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 59.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
133.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 59.53%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1497.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 18.31%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
453.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 18.31%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
68.14%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 18.31%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.44%
Firm’s AR is declining while FNV shows 15.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.67%
Negative asset growth while FNV invests at 3.01%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
6.55%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 2.52%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.88%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.14%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.