PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.75%
Positive revenue growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.32%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.60%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FNV's 7.49%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
24.60%
Positive operating income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-0.65%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 1.30%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
94.44%
EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 20.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
88.89%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 20.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.02%
OCF growth under 50% of FNV's 24.89%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
12.57%
FCF growth under 50% of FNV's 64.12%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
118459836.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 107.29%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
221.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 107.29%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
104.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to FNV's 107.29%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
6300.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 432.62%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
379.59%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 432.62%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
143.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 432.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
122932.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 218.64% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
363.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 218.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
176.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of FNV's 218.64%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
215.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 24.86%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
86.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 24.86%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.31%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. FNV's 61.41%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.63%
Asset growth well under 50% of FNV's 13.21%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.84%
Under 50% of FNV's 13.55%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.66%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.35%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.