PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.29%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 5.89%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.43%
Negative gross profit growth while FNV is at 2.73%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.43%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 43.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.43%
Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 12.94%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
8.35%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 63.43%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of FNV's 60.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FNV's 60.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.26%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.07%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.21%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-61.46%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-5.26%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
29250.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 1309.09%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
369.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 68.55%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
194.35%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 68.55%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
73.48%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 46.94%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1883.30%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 19.94%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
271.01%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 19.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
62.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 21.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1508.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 143.63% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
165.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 143.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
7.72%
Below 50% of FNV's 52.71%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
3689.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 40.36%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
157.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 40.36%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
62.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 18.63%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.62%
AR growth well above FNV's 3.13%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Asset growth well under 50% of FNV's 1.60%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.94%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 1.27%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-9.00%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
We cut SG&A while FNV invests at 13.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.