PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.61%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of FNV's 1.21%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-0.39%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.39%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
21.86%
Positive net income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
18.18%
Positive EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
18.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.48%
Slight or no buybacks while FNV is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.39%
Slight or no buyback while FNV is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-10.15%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
4.99%
Positive OCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-6.13%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
238.75%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 60.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
241.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 60.65%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
10.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 1.99%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
110932.14%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
343.50%
Positive OCF/share growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-1.33%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1134.29%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
242.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-24.60%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
3212.75%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 41.10%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
186.70%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 41.10%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
46.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 9.54%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.02%
Firm’s AR is declining while FNV shows 18.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.20%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.91%
Positive BV/share change while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.02%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.28%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.