PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.16%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.53%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-18.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.45%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-18.18%
Negative EPS growth while FNV is at 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FNV is at 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.07%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 0.13%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.70%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
1085.59%
FCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 134.76%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 65.67%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-24.65%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2800.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 16.78%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
222.96%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 72.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-39.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1699.31%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 154.42% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
186.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 1.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-57.64%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
5331.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 34.45%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
123.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 17.57%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
41.24%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 1.08%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 94.15%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
57.80%
AR growth well above FNV's 1.52%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Asset growth well under 50% of FNV's 2.25%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.92%
Similar to FNV's 2.03%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
0.02%
Debt growth of 0.02% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FNV's 7.14%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.