PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.36%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 14.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-25.34%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-25.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-25.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1057.27%
Positive net income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1300.00%
Positive EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1300.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.48%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 3.38%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.44%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 3.67%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-8.03%
Dividend reduction while FNV stands at 0.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-15.44%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
299.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 85.71%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
43.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 9.81%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-30.25%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
511.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 35.81%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
22.41%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 29.47%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
-45.18%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
269.19%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-5.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-65.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV is 100.96%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
583.10%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 52.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
94.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 26.70%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
30.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 1.08%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.88%
Negative near-term dividend growth while FNV invests at 26.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
98.06%
AR growth well above FNV's 4.34%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.64%
Positive asset growth while FNV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.60%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.03%
Debt growth of 0.03% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FNV's 33.33%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.