PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Revenue growth under 50% of FNV's 4.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.02%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FNV's 8.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.37%
EBIT growth below 50% of FNV's 10.78%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.37%
Operating income growth under 50% of FNV's 12.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-1.53%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 31.58%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 2.15%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 1.92%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-29.69%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
3.56%
Positive OCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
3.57%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
157.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 131.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
0.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 27.69%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-0.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV stands at 29.83%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
139.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 73.78%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-19.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV is at 31.68%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-13.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV stands at 15.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
74.58%
Below 50% of FNV's 227.93%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-55.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
1100.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 47.21%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
235.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 66.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
36.34%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 13.41%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
14.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 9.63%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.06%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while FNV stands at 14.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
65.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 16.68%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
56.16%
AR growth well above FNV's 17.79%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.01%
Negative asset growth while FNV invests at 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.66%
Positive BV/share change while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.39%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.