PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.60%
Positive revenue growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.05%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.39%
Positive EBIT growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.39%
Positive operating income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
367.01%
Positive net income growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
380.00%
Positive EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
380.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.10%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.87%
Positive OCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-483.01%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 105.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
115.86%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to FNV's 112.22%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
1.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 36.45%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 24.21%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
90.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 107.52%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-13.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV is at 28.24%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
12.80%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 56.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
590.04%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 192.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
258.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 95.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
439.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 109.06%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
227.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 64.90%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
30.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 20.83%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
6.84%
Below 50% of FNV's 19.17%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.93%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while FNV stands at 5.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
71.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 26.55%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
453.10%
AR growth well above FNV's 1.47%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Asset growth above 1.5x FNV's 0.21%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.16%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 0.23%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
44.27%
Debt growth of 44.27% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
SG&A growth well above FNV's 55.56%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.