95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.01%
Revenue growth under 50% of FNV's 38.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
42.43%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of FNV's 50.00%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
173.43%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FNV's 52.24%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
173.43%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 54.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
160.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x FNV's 58.75%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
160.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 58.82%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
160.71%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 58.82%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.23%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.27%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.31%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.32%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-48.78%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
30.24%
OCF growth at 50-75% of FNV's 43.07%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
30.44%
Positive FCF growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
124.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 242.23%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
8.13%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 76.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-5.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV stands at 30.03%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
119.98%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 146.63%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-5.19%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV is at 67.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-13.15%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
58.76%
Below 50% of FNV's 391.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1255.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 146.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-9.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FNV is 77.21%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
121.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 57.29%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
15.88%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 13.96%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
3.35%
Below 50% of FNV's 11.14%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.92%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 19.30%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
66.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 4.41%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
156.25%
AR growth well above FNV's 20.90%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Positive asset growth while FNV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.52%
75-90% of FNV's 1.92%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-7.47%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.56%
SG&A growth of 7.56% while FNV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.