PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.85%
Negative revenue growth while FNV stands at 8.83%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.30%
Negative gross profit growth while FNV is at 4.27%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.75%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 10.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.75%
Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 9.81%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
4.90%
Net income growth under 50% of FNV's 14.81%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
6.06%
EPS growth under 50% of FNV's 14.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FNV's 14.81%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.09%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 0.63%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.31%
Reduced diluted shares while FNV is at 0.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
25.60%
Dividend growth above 1.5x FNV's 1.15%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-8.83%
Negative OCF growth while FNV is at 16.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8.64%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 41.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
50.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 138.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
27.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 106.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
16.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 76.79%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
30.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 168.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
39.76%
Below 50% of FNV's 233.09%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
24.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 89.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
0.37%
Below 50% of FNV's 402.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
183.27%
Below 50% of FNV's 561.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
212.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of FNV's 294.33%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
98.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 54.23%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
23.42%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 41.28%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
14.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 12.31%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.09%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 37.85%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
39.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 21.50%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-3.56%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
238799900.00%
Inventory growth well above FNV's 150.00%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.20%
Negative asset growth while FNV invests at 4.39%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.85%
75-90% of FNV's 3.43%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-59.56%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.