95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.19%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 0.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
9.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FNV's 39.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
6.22%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FNV's 1.60%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
6.22%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of FNV's 8.75%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-25.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-25.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-25.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.10%
Diluted share count expanding well above FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
OCF growth at 50-75% of FNV's 9.22%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
176.60%
FCF growth under 50% of FNV's 470.28%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
58.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 81.80%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
55.15%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 45.95%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-10.17%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
79.88%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FNV's 198.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
110.42%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 57.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
7.26%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
51.96%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of FNV's 64.21%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
196.44%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 20.32%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-26.91%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
61.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 46.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
37.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 17.93%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.58%
Positive short-term equity growth while FNV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
144.99%
10Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 100.70%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if a higher payout growth rate remains sustainable long term.
115.34%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 66.41%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
33.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR similar to FNV's 31.85%. Walter Schloss finds parallel short-term dividend strategies for both companies.
80.90%
Our AR growth while FNV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-8195400.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.97%
Asset growth at 50-75% of FNV's 1.44%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.18%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 0.48%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-3.35%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.05%
SG&A growth well above FNV's 20.51%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.