PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.44%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FNV's 15.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
60.21%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 49.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
-31.17%
Negative EBIT growth while FNV is at 13.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-33.15%
Negative operating income growth while FNV is at 19.45%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-43.00%
Negative net income growth while FNV stands at 14.87%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-44.12%
Negative EPS growth while FNV is at 15.19%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-44.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FNV is at 15.19%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.25%
Share reduction while FNV is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 0.03%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.19%
Dividend growth under 50% of FNV's 1.50%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
25.61%
OCF growth above 1.5x FNV's 13.76%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-8.90%
Negative FCF growth while FNV is at 1026.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
121.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 108.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
68.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 20.23%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
35.77%
Positive 3Y CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
177.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with FNV's 172.80%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
139.14%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 28.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
62.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FNV is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
38.48%
Below 50% of FNV's 11698.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
12.23%
Below 50% of FNV's 51.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-70.02%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
63.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 42.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
34.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 15.63%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
15.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 26.01%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
235.15%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 116.99%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
103.88%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 71.72%. Bruce Berkowitz verifies that high dividend hikes remain sustainable, not a sign of over-distribution.
21.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 33.47%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-47.47%
Firm’s AR is declining while FNV shows 13.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.52%
Similar asset growth to FNV's 0.49%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
0.24%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FNV's 0.03%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-8.70%
We’re deleveraging while FNV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.