95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.62%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 15.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
0.89%
Positive gross profit growth while FNV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
136.68%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FNV's 22.14%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
147.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FNV's 16.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
188.14%
Net income growth above 1.5x FNV's 19.61%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
194.74%
EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 19.78%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FNV's 19.78%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 0.02%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FNV's 0.18%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FNV's 172.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
82.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 49.89%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
52.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 7.69%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.09%
Below 50% of FNV's 783.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
164.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FNV's 307.78%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
60.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FNV's 14.17%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.42%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FNV's 152.63%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.