PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
35.21%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
35.21%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
103.36%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
103.36%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
103.36%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
103.35%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
103.35%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.25%
Positive OCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
86.25%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
17.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 149.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
17.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 188.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 30.54%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.60%
Our AR growth while FSM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
10.87%
We show growth while FSM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.90%
Positive asset growth while FSM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.98%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.78%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.38%
We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.