PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.81%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.81%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-197.39%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-197.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-197.36%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-198.04%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-198.04%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.39%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-92.39%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
13.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 149.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
13.24%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 188.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
8.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 30.54%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.50%
Our AR growth while FSM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.03%
We show growth while FSM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.74%
Positive asset growth while FSM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.49%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.78%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.49%
We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.