PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.63%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
34.63%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
315.91%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
315.91%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
460.42%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-266.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-266.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4117.61%
Positive OCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
4117.61%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
48.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 149.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
48.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 188.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-24.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSM stands at 30.54%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.15%
Our AR growth while FSM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.29%
We show growth while FSM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
13.98%
Positive asset growth while FSM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
15.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.78%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.37%
We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.