PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.10%
Revenue growth of 1.10% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
4.09%
Gross profit growth of 4.09% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-47.73%
Negative EBIT growth while FSM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-47.73%
Negative operating income growth while FSM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
4.94%
Net income growth of 4.94% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.23%
OCF growth of 0.23% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
0.23%
FCF growth of 0.23% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
159.51%
10Y CAGR of 159.51% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
191.27%
5Y CAGR of 191.27% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
245.23%
3Y CAGR of 245.23% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 465.61%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
2350.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 465.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
230.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
228.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1189.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 490.00%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1571.05%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 490.00%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.73%
Asset growth of 5.73% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
8.82%
BV/share growth of 8.82% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
SG&A growth of 16.23% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.