PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.05%
Negative revenue growth while FSM stands at 66.11%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.94%
Negative gross profit growth while FSM is at 153.64%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-8.75%
Negative EBIT growth while FSM is at 247.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-8.75%
Negative operating income growth while FSM is at 247.17%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-8.35%
Negative net income growth while FSM stands at 158.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.09%
Negative EPS growth while FSM is at 139.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FSM is at 139.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.36%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 9.65%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 30.38%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.87%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-6.87%
Negative FCF growth while FSM is at 23.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
136.57%
10Y CAGR of 136.57% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
101.69%
5Y CAGR of 101.69% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1165.13%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSM's 1541.96%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
1283.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSM's 1541.96%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3452.22%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 186.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1028.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 186.02%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1193.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 533.85%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1764.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 533.85%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.37%
Our AR growth while FSM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while FSM stands at 4.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.81%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSM's 15.35%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.28%
Similar to FSM's 6.29%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.67%
We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.