PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.85%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
32.57%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
31.93%
EBIT growth below 50% of FSM's 168.61%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
31.93%
Operating income growth under 50% of FSM's 168.61%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
29.71%
Net income growth under 50% of FSM's 141.41%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
22.22%
EPS growth under 50% of FSM's 141.47%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FSM's 141.47%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.39%
Share change of 0.39% while FSM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.49%
Diluted share change of 1.49% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.93%
OCF growth at 50-75% of FSM's 37.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
26.93%
FCF growth under 50% of FSM's 150.29%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
196.70%
10Y CAGR of 196.70% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
135.29%
5Y CAGR of 135.29% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
137.47%
3Y CAGR of 137.47% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2148.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSM's 2603.90%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
271.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 1764.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2063.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 423.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
193.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of FSM's 247.78%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1201.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 647.54%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
144.59%
Below 50% of FSM's 2669.05%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.70%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. FSM's 55.31%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.67%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSM's 7.54%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.54%
Under 50% of FSM's 5.50%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.49%
We’re deleveraging while FSM stands at 57.51%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.77%
We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.