Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.

Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

10Y CAGR of 184.72% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.

5Y CAGR of 151.42% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.

3Y CAGR of 127.75% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive OCF/share growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 66.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 59.03%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 563.20%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

Our AR growth while FSM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive BV/share change while FSM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while FSM stands at 19.93%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.