PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.31%
Revenue growth under 50% of FSM's 2046.76%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
428.44%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FSM's 208.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1191.12%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FSM's 101.39%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1191.12%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FSM's 101.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
130.31%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSM's 53.55%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
133.33%
EPS growth above 1.5x FSM's 54.51%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
133.33%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FSM's 54.51%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.83%
Positive OCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-7.04%
Negative FCF growth while FSM is at 22.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
80.53%
10Y CAGR of 80.53% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
201.03%
5Y CAGR of 201.03% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-0.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSM stands at 9407.42%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1448.55%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 13.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
13.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 212.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.84%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 46.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-25.18%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSM is 78.39%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2112.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 492.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
94.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 27.68%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.40%
Our AR growth while FSM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.66%
Positive asset growth while FSM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
27.41%
Positive BV/share change while FSM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-58.40%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.83%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FSM's 18.44%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.