PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
68.51%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FSM's 2.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
62.95%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FSM's 4.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
82.56%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.76%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
82.56%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.76%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
82.05%
Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
57.14%
Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
83.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
5.19%
Share count expansion well above FSM's 0.52%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above FSM's 0.52%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.55%
Positive OCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-769.02%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
201.56%
10Y CAGR of 201.56% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.40%
3Y CAGR of 17.40% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.53%
Below 50% of FSM's 259.66%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
12.86%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 12.86% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
261.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 37.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
4.77%
Below 50% of FSM's 83.26%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
1398.92%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 515.18%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-82.05%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FSM is at 515.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
87.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 43.36%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.67%
Our AR growth while FSM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.25%
Asset growth above 1.5x FSM's 6.83%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
19.91%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSM's 4.00%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
88.69%
Debt growth far above FSM's 132.48%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
We cut SG&A while FSM invests at 10.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.