PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.79%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 23.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
45.14%
Gross profit growth similar to FSM's 46.66%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
50.25%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FSM's 26.78%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
50.25%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FSM's 26.78%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
51.37%
Net income growth under 50% of FSM's 286.51%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
36.36%
EPS growth under 50% of FSM's 286.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FSM's 286.67%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
9.22%
Share change of 9.22% while FSM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
9.14%
Diluted share change of 9.14% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.41%
OCF growth under 50% of FSM's 140.37%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
140.85%
FCF growth 50-75% of FSM's 213.55%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
235.19%
10Y CAGR of 235.19% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
179.18%
5Y CAGR of 179.18% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
33.83%
3Y CAGR of 33.83% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
399.61%
Below 50% of FSM's 1412.91%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
53.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 53.51% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 184.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
37.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 37.95% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.55%
Below 50% of FSM's 2267.79%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
73.36%
Equity/share CAGR of 73.36% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSM shows 616.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Negative asset growth while FSM invests at 6.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.17%
We have a declining book value while FSM shows 5.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-52.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FSM's 76.77%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.