PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.09%
Negative revenue growth while FSM stands at 7.26%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.91%
Negative gross profit growth while FSM is at 19.27%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.34%
EBIT growth below 50% of FSM's 69.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.34%
Operating income growth under 50% of FSM's 69.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-12.16%
Negative net income growth while FSM stands at 451.98%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FSM is at 346.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.85%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-17.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
213.02%
10Y CAGR of 213.02% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
160.78%
5Y CAGR of 160.78% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
25.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 125.51%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
445.64%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSM's 547.91%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
24.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 56.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSM's 407.71%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
15.46%
Below 50% of FSM's 340.43%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
443.23%
Below 50% of FSM's 4545.35%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
64.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 39.83%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.90%
Our AR growth while FSM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSM's 26.83%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.12%
Under 50% of FSM's 25.46%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
270.10%
We have some new debt while FSM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.61%
We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.