PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.55%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
42.29%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
31.40%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.40%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
19.33%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 17.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
-73.33%
Negative EPS growth while FSM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-69.23%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FSM is at 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.16%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 10.32%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.51%
Reduced diluted shares while FSM is at 8.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.30%
OCF growth at 50-75% of FSM's 28.67%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
17.36%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
78.28%
10Y CAGR of 78.28% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
140.24%
5Y CAGR of 140.24% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
48.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 12.03%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
252.65%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 408.57%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
55.50%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 106.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
285.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 417.08%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
50.62%
Below 50% of FSM's 380.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
440.98%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 632.48%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
60.50%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 21.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.50%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. FSM's 102.80%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Asset growth above 1.5x FSM's 2.32%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.83%
Positive BV/share change while FSM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-75.82%
We’re deleveraging while FSM stands at 10.25%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.97%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.