PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.75%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.32%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of FSM's 16.66%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
24.60%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.60%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-0.65%
Negative net income growth while FSM stands at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
94.44%
EPS growth above 1.5x FSM's 4.71%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
88.89%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FSM's 4.71%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.02%
OCF growth under 50% of FSM's 30.05%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
12.57%
FCF growth under 50% of FSM's 34.24%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
118459836.13%
10Y CAGR of 118459836.13% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
221.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 16222.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
104.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of FSM's 117.22%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
6300.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 1447.69%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
379.59%
Below 50% of FSM's 1624.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
143.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of FSM's 433.86%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
122932.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 270.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
363.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 169.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
176.77%
Below 50% of FSM's 610.88%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
215.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 99.45%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
86.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 32.20%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.31%
AR growth well above FSM's 3.86%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.63%
Positive asset growth while FSM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.84%
Positive BV/share change while FSM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.66%
We’re deleveraging while FSM stands at 3.18%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.35%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.