Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Slight or no buybacks while FSM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

Dividend growth of 199.89% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

FCF growth above 1.5x FSM's 55.77%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.

10Y CAGR of 571.98% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.

5Y CAGR of 174.59% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 2140.64%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

OCF/share CAGR of 242.80% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 21.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

Positive 10Y CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Net income/share CAGR of 280.54% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.

3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 38.36%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 924.06%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

Equity/share CAGR of 158.46% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 103.92%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.

Firm’s AR is declining while FSM shows 6.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Asset growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.65%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.

We’re deleveraging while FSM stands at 11.30%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.