95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
78.11%
Positive revenue growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
56.56%
Positive gross profit growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
56.27%
Positive EBIT growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.27%
Positive operating income growth while FSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
48.49%
Net income growth above 1.5x FSM's 5.56%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
47.06%
EPS growth above 1.5x FSM's 16.67%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
47.06%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FSM's 16.67%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.14%
Share change of 0.14% while FSM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSM's 0.26%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-30.00%
Dividend reduction while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
97.45%
OCF growth above 1.5x FSM's 26.16%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
149.53%
Positive FCF growth while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
747.55%
10Y CAGR of 747.55% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
260.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 171.44%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
206.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 72.70%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
10355.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 4522.43%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
365.07%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 70.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
245.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 116.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
9636.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 1221.25% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
349.98%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 246.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
237.90%
Below 50% of FSM's 508.97%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
3155.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 920.08%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
150.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 49.78%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
74.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to FSM's 75.16%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while FSM stands at 5.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.69%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 3.82%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
4.28%
1.25-1.5x FSM's 3.85%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-12.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
We expand SG&A while FSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.