PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-28.37%
Negative revenue growth while FSM stands at 7.44%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.08%
Negative gross profit growth while FSM is at 26.54%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.72%
Negative EBIT growth while FSM is at 37.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.72%
Negative operating income growth while FSM is at 37.99%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.94%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-26.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-34.81%
Negative OCF growth while FSM is at 25.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-787.15%
Negative FCF growth while FSM is at 104.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
565.78%
10Y CAGR of 565.78% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
164.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 299.34%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
131.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 84.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
89499.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 3895.69%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.34%
Below 50% of FSM's 961.94%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
177.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSM's 351.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
7607.09%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 332.92% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
200.94%
Below 50% of FSM's 796.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
188.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3166.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 876.97%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
149.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 67.74%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
75.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 42.48%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.97%
Asset growth above 1.5x FSM's 3.50%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.82%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSM's 2.05%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
2077.39%
We have some new debt while FSM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.73%
SG&A growth well above FSM's 9.20%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.