PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.29%
Negative revenue growth while FSM stands at 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.43%
Negative gross profit growth while FSM is at 25.66%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.43%
Negative EBIT growth while FSM is at 115.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.43%
Negative operating income growth while FSM is at 115.99%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
8.35%
Net income growth under 50% of FSM's 97.50%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of FSM's 97.51%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FSM's 97.49%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.26%
Share count expansion well above FSM's 0.26%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.21%
Diluted share count expanding well above FSM's 0.30%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-61.46%
Dividend reduction while FSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-5.26%
Negative OCF growth while FSM is at 98.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
29250.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x FSM's 61.22%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
369.06%
10Y CAGR of 369.06% while FSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
194.35%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to FSM's 178.91%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
73.48%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 47.24%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1883.30%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 303.94%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
271.01%
Below 50% of FSM's 4396.50%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
62.94%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1508.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 78.10% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
165.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 38.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
7.72%
Below 50% of FSM's 90.87%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
3689.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 1018.05%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
157.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FSM's 70.72%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
62.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FSM's 49.57%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.62%
Our AR growth while FSM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Asset growth well under 50% of FSM's 0.28%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.94%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.17%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-9.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.